General Partners (GP) vs. Limited Partners (LP) in Private Equity

Two central players play a key role in the private equity sector: the general partner (GP) and the limited partner (LP). But what is the difference between GPs and LPs, what tasks do they perform and how are their roles changing in the current market environment?

What is a Limited Partner (LP)?

A limited partner (LP) is an investor in a limited partnership. They provide capital but do not take an active role in the operational business. They are so to speak, a “silent partner” who stays in the background and is not involved in the day-to-day business.

What is a General Partner (GP)?

A general partner (GP) is a person or company that is responsible for the management of a partnership or limited partnership and is liable with all of its assets. In the field of venture capital or private equity, the GP acts as a fund manager, makes investment decisions and manages the fund’s assets.

What is the difference between GP vs LP?

The general partner (GP) is the active manager of a fund. It assumes responsibility for capital investment, portfolio management and communication with investors. In contrast, the limited partner (LP) is an investor who participates financially in the fund but does not intervene in operational management and thus assumes the role of a “silent partner”.

Tasks of a Limited Partner

LPs invest capital in private equity funds and expect an appropriate return in return. Their tasks include:

  • Selection of suitable funds and GPs
  • Evaluation of the investment strategy
  • Monitoring fund performance
  • Analysis of reports and performance data
  • Participation in distributions

However, due to increasing competitive pressure, LPs expect more than just passive participation: they demand a high degree of transparency, detailed information on investments and strategies as well as regular, meaningful reports on the fund’s performance.

The process of investing in private equity funds

Limited partners invest in private equity funds by committing to provide a certain amount of capital during the life of the fund. The company managed by the general partners requests capital from the LPs when investment opportunities arise. LPs generally have limited control over investment decisions as the GPs are responsible for sourcing, acquiring and managing the portfolio companies.

The Role of GPs and LPs in Real Estate Investment Partnerships

Within private equity, real estate investment has become a significant area where GPs and LPs collaborate. In a real estate partnership, the partnership agreement typically defines how passive investors (LPs) commit capital, while GPs take on the active role of identifying opportunities, managing risk, overseeing operations, and seeking value creation. Investment strategies may include residential projects, commercial real estate, real estate syndication, or broader estate investing approaches, depending on the risk tolerance of the fund and its investors. Returns are often structured so that both LP and GP stakeholders receive a share of the profits, with GPs additionally earning carried interest and a management fee for their work. Successful real estate investing requires careful due diligence, strong investor relations, and an understanding of corporate structures, liability, and the varying market conditions in each state, and finally a well-planned exit strategy. This combination of responsibilities essentially defines the role of a General Partner.

Tasks of a General Partner

In private equity firms, general partners have a number of key responsibilities. Their main responsibilities include:

  1. Raising capital and presenting the investment strategy and track record to LPs
  2. Deal generation, and thus maintaining relationships with potential business partners and industry networks
  3. Examination and evaluation of investment opportunities including due diligence and yield analysis
  4. Negotiation and structuring of transactions
  5. Optimization of portfolio companies through strategic initiatives and ongoing performance monitoring (after acquisition)
  6. Realization of the exit strategy

The next section takes a closer look at the individual phases of the investment process from the perspective of a general partner.

Phases and responsibilities of a BP in an investment

In the context of a private equity investment, the general partner bears the main operational and strategic responsibility. Its tasks extend over the entire life cycle of an investment, from identification to sale. A distinction can be made between two central phases:

Before closing the deal: analysis, structuring and negotiation

In the preparatory phase of an investment, the GP’s focus is on identifying attractive target companies and carefully analyzing potential opportunities and risks. This phase is crucial for the subsequent performance of the portfolio and involves a large number of complex tasks:

1. Sourcing and Deal Origination

GPs use their network, specialized consultants and market analyses to identify suitable investment targets. Industry knowledge plays a key role in identifying companies with potential for value appreciation at an early stage.

2. Due Diligence

As soon as a target company is considered, a comprehensive due diligence process begins. This includes legal, financial, tax, operational and ESG aspects. The aim is to recognize risks, validate valuation assumptions and identify potential deal breakers at an early stage.

3. Structuring of the Transaction

Based on the results of the due diligence, the GP develops a customized transaction structure. This includes, among other things

  • Financing model (equity/debt share)
  • Shareholding structure
  • Governance regulations
  • Contract design with protection mechanisms (e.g. earn-outs, guarantees)

4. Negotiations and Conclusion

The GP handles the negotiations with sellers, banks and advisors in order to secure the best possible conditions for the fund and the LPs. After successful completion, the closing process takes place, during which all legal and financial conditions are finalized.

After the deal: Value enhancement, controlling and exit strategy

After closing, the actual management and value creation phase begins. This is where the GP develops its operational strength and implements targeted measures to sustainably increase the value of the company.

1. Integration and Strategy Implementation

Immediately after the acquisition, the GP begins integrating new structures, systems or processes. He implements the planned value enhancement strategy and works closely with the portfolio company’s management team.

2. Operational Support and Controlling

GPs take on an active role in strategic controlling:

  • Regular monitoring of key financial figures
  • Review of target achievement
  • Support with restructuring, reorganization or expansion
  • Appointment to key positions (e.g. CFO or advisory board)

3. Reporting to LPs

Alongside operational support, the GP regularly informs its limited partners about the development of the portfolio. The requirements for transparency and depth of detail have increased considerably in recent years. Limited partners demand granular information about:

  • Performance of individual investments
  • Valuation methods and valuation bases
  • Development of key figures at portfolio level

4. Preparation and Implementation of the Exit

As soon as the portfolio company has achieved an increase in value, the GP prepares the exit. Depending on the market situation, different strategies are possible, including:

  • Sale to a strategic investor
  • Secondary sale to another PE fund
  • IPO (initial public offering)
  • Management buy-out/buy-in

The GP manages the exit process and ensures optimal utilization of the invested capital with the aim of generating maximum distributions for the LPs.

Current challenges: What LPs expect from GPs today

The relationship between limited partners and general partners is undergoing significant change. Increasing market complexity and growing competitive pressure mean that LPs now place significantly higher demands on GPs than they did a few years ago.

More transparency and granular data

The requirements of limited partners have increased significantly with time and complex market structures. An annual report alone is no longer sufficient. Instead, investors expect standardized reports that enable consistent comparability as well as detailed insights at portfolio level. They also value transparent fee structures and comprehensible valuations of individual investments in order to be able to make well-founded decisions.

Liquidity despite a difficult market

In view of stagnating exit opportunities, GPs are under increasing pressure to create liquidity. Among other things, NAV-based loans, continuation funds, cross-fund transactions, dividend recaps and partial exits are being used. At the same time, limited partners are demanding full transparency with regard to the valuation methods used and the underlying data.

How DiliTrust supports GPs and LPs

The increasing requirements of LPs are putting GPs under pressure to act. Professional support is needed, especially in the areas of contract management, reporting and compliance. This is where DiliTrust steps in.

DiliTrust offers a central platform for managing contractual obligations from agreements such as LPAs and side letters. In addition, automated workflows ensure efficient adherence to compliance requirements, optimized deadline management and a clear distribution of tasks, among many other benefits.

In addition, the integrated entity management module enables structured organization and maintenance of all holdings and companies.

Moreover, the Board Portal provides a protected, central space for organizing and conducting board meetings. In this way, DiliTrust meets the expectations of modern LPs and GPs alike.

Conclusion: GP vs LP, a partnership in transition

The relationship between general partners and limited partners is constantly evolving. GPs today have to deliver far more than just good returns. Transparency, individualization and digital processes have become the new standard. Tools such as DiliTrust help to meet the increased requirements and ensure a long-term, trusting partnership with LPs.

Overall, it’s not an LP vs GP situation, or vice versa. As you can see are both working together at one string and toward the same goals. One cannot function without the other. Each brings unique value, resources and expertise to the partnership, and long-term success in private equity depends on collaboration.